Systems Engineering & Infrastructure

Private AI & high-performance infrastructure

Decide whether private AI is worth building before buying hardware.

We compare a dedicated AI platform with hosted alternatives for your use case. The review covers data, computing capacity, expected demand, cost and who would operate it. If the case holds up, we scope the design and testing.

Part of Systems Engineering & Infrastructure

AI use case · Platform design · Cost comparison · Performance tests

The first decision

Does the workload
justify the platform?

Compare the hardware proposal with the work it must perform, the cost of alternatives and the people needed to run it.

Business caseDemand worth serving

Volume · latency · quality
Measure of business value

Technical fitA viable system

Data · integration · capacity
Security and recovery

Operating caseAn owner for the life of it

Facilities · suppliers · support
Recurring cost and alternatives

Feasibility decision

ProceedRevise the approachDefer investment

The assessment determines the next commitment. Procurement and deployment are separately agreed scopes.

Engagement sequence

Check the case first.
Agree each next step.

The review may recommend proceeding, changing the approach or waiting. Platform design, supplier review and deployment testing are agreed separately.

The architecture review

One assessment across business, platform, and operations.

We review how the platform would use your data, connect to other systems, control access and operate day to day. Expand the list to see the ten areas covered.

Inspect the ten assessment areas
  1. 01

    Business outcome

    Workload, success measure, service level, and investment threshold.

  2. 02

    Governance, risk, compliance

    Policy boundary, risk owner, data obligations, and approval path.

  3. 03

    Operations and ownership

    Who runs the platform, the support included, operating instructions and who approves changes.

  4. 04

    Monitoring and evaluation

    Model quality, drift, telemetry, cost, safety, and acceptance evidence.

  5. 05

    Integration and orchestration

    Workflows, agents, APIs, queues, failure modes, and human control points.

  6. 06

    Models and platform

    Model mix, runtime, portability, licensing, and platform exit conditions.

  7. 07

    Compute and capacity

    Training and inference demand, GPU topology, thermal envelope, and growth headroom.

  8. 08

    Data

    Sources, residency, lineage, storage IOPS, retrieval, retention, and recovery.

  9. 09

    Identity and access

    Entra and RBAC isolation for people, services, agents, and privileged operations.

  10. 10

    Network and security boundary

    Segmentation, RoCE or InfiniBand fabric, ingress, egress, and trust boundaries.

Engagement requirements

A sponsor for the decision.
An owner for the result.

Bring a defined use case or workload, an executive sponsor, and an internal technical owner. Existing architecture, capacity estimates, or supplier proposals provide a useful starting point.

The scope states the inputs, assessment methods, assumptions, deliverables, fixed fee, and acceptance criteria. AZ Innovations is responsible for the architecture and delivery coordination agreed in the scope. Licensed engineering and specialist trade work is performed by qualified delivery partners where required.

How engagements work

Before procurement

Know the cost and operating needs before you buy.

Share the AI use case, supplier proposal or capacity question, and your deadline. We explain what information is needed to compare the options.

Request an Architecture Briefing