Private AI Feasibility & Cost Review
Should this platform be built, bought, hosted, or deferred?
A comparison of platform options, capacity needs, estimated costs and operating responsibilities before you invest.
Discuss this projectPrivate AI & high-performance infrastructure
We compare a dedicated AI platform with hosted alternatives for your use case. The review covers data, computing capacity, expected demand, cost and who would operate it. If the case holds up, we scope the design and testing.
AI use case · Platform design · Cost comparison · Performance tests
The first decision
Compare the hardware proposal with the work it must perform, the cost of alternatives and the people needed to run it.
Volume · latency · quality
Measure of business value
Data · integration · capacity
Security and recovery
Facilities · suppliers · support
Recurring cost and alternatives
Feasibility decision
The assessment determines the next commitment. Procurement and deployment are separately agreed scopes.
Engagement sequence
The review may recommend proceeding, changing the approach or waiting. Platform design, supplier review and deployment testing are agreed separately.
Should this platform be built, bought, hosted, or deferred?
A comparison of platform options, capacity needs, estimated costs and operating responsibilities before you invest.
Discuss this projectWhat production design can carry the workloads, data, identities, and operating model?
A system design showing data flows, access controls, connections and operating responsibilities, with reasons for the key choices.
Discuss this projectDoes the proposed capacity, contract, and partner responsibility match the design?
A supplier review covering cost assumptions, missing requirements, exit options and the tests required before sign-off.
Discuss this projectDid the delivered platform meet the approved design and production threshold?
Deployment records, performance test results, outstanding issues and a recommendation on whether to accept the platform.
Discuss this projectThe architecture review
We review how the platform would use your data, connect to other systems, control access and operate day to day. Expand the list to see the ten areas covered.
Workload, success measure, service level, and investment threshold.
Policy boundary, risk owner, data obligations, and approval path.
Who runs the platform, the support included, operating instructions and who approves changes.
Model quality, drift, telemetry, cost, safety, and acceptance evidence.
Workflows, agents, APIs, queues, failure modes, and human control points.
Model mix, runtime, portability, licensing, and platform exit conditions.
Training and inference demand, GPU topology, thermal envelope, and growth headroom.
Sources, residency, lineage, storage IOPS, retrieval, retention, and recovery.
Entra and RBAC isolation for people, services, agents, and privileged operations.
Segmentation, RoCE or InfiniBand fabric, ingress, egress, and trust boundaries.
Engagement requirements
Bring a defined use case or workload, an executive sponsor, and an internal technical owner. Existing architecture, capacity estimates, or supplier proposals provide a useful starting point.
The scope states the inputs, assessment methods, assumptions, deliverables, fixed fee, and acceptance criteria. AZ Innovations is responsible for the architecture and delivery coordination agreed in the scope. Licensed engineering and specialist trade work is performed by qualified delivery partners where required.
How engagements workBefore procurement
Share the AI use case, supplier proposal or capacity question, and your deadline. We explain what information is needed to compare the options.
Request an Architecture Briefing